Ferrum Capital Lawsuit 2021
If you blinked in 2021, you missed one of the quieter, yet more instructive, legal brawls in the special purpose acquisition company (SPAC) universe. While most eyes were on Elon Musk’s Twitter antics and crypto volatility, a Delaware LLC named Hightower Holding was locked in a bitter arbitration-turned-lawsuit with an investment firm called Ferrum Capital Partners.
The significance of the Bexar County lawsuit cannot be overstated. It was the catalyst that led to the company's downfall. Following this lawsuit, a judge took control of Ferrum Capital, placing it under receivership in January 2024. The receivership would ultimately expose the full scale of the fraud and begin the process of trying to recover funds for victims.
The Ferrum Capital lawsuit has significant implications for the financial services industry: ferrum capital lawsuit 2021
Lubbock, Texas businessmen and Michael Cox founded Ferrum Capital in 2017. They designed the operation to solicit retail investor capital primarily throughout the Lubbock region, while relying on their high-profile San Antonio business affiliate, Brooklynn Chandler Willy , to channel millions of dollars from central Texas.
Plaintiffs in these lawsuits described devastating losses. Some older couples reported investing their entire retirement savings of up to If you blinked in 2021, you missed one
Disclaimer: This post is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or an endorsement of any party’s claims. Always consult legal counsel regarding active or historical litigation.
Investors were explicitly told their money was safe, secure, and fully collateralized. It was the catalyst that led to the company's downfall
in a Ferrum entity. Instead of investing the funds, she reportedly used the money for personal expenses and to pay off other investors—a classic hallmark of a Ponzi scheme. Federal Charges (2025-2026) : In July 2025, Ferrum Capital owners Joshua Allen Michael Cox were indicted alongside
Promising high, fixed annual returns between 8% and 10%, the defendants pitched these vehicles as secure, fully backed positions. They told clients that their money was being used strictly by third-party agencies to buy up underpriced, distressed consumer debt portfolios for pennies on the dollar and collect the balances for high margins.
